« In search of a banana monkey | Main | Please don't... »
Thursday, June 28, 2007
Getting Pap Smeared (and not liking it even a little)
Sorry about the title, but I'm in a vile mood. Why? Well, glad you asked.
Between 5:45 AM and 6:15AM when I would have loved to have been writing a post and reading the news, I ended up having to delete several hundred spam comments, as well as having to add the spammer's IP ranges to my ban list.
I've mentally dubbed this particular attack 'The Pap Smear' because 99% of the bogus names on the spam comments started with 'Pap...' (e.g. Papskis3ud, Papxcs5s, Papzqu&dy, etc.).
This is the second time in as many weeks that treppenwitz has come under attack from this source and my hosting service's filters seem incapable of shielding me.
I honestly don't know what the goal of these spammers could possible be. I mean, if they're selling something, nobody is going to take out their credit card after taking a gander at the spam site's garbled syntax and random sentence structure.
If they're trying to jam up servers or deny service to the sites they are attacking, the volume is well below that threshold.
So what is it? What is their goal???
It obviously takes a certain level of technical sophistication to program the 'bots' that identify target sites and send out the comment and track-back spam. It also requires at least a minimal investment in equipment (despite the fact that they often hijack unsuspecting computers to do their bidding) to mount these attacks.
So, other than being disruptive and destructive, I just don't understand what the percentage is in being a spammer!
Enlightenment please.
Posted by David Bogner on June 28, 2007 | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c581e53ef00e5503e6ff98833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Getting Pap Smeared (and not liking it even a little):
Comments
I read recently that the point of garbled, non-sense spam is to mess with spam filters. The garbled message doesn't look like typical spam that spam filters can detect, so it gets passed along. The eventual goal is for people to get frustrated with their spam detection software. If people feel that spam filters are ineffective, they'll stop using them and spammers will be able to more effectively spam.
Posted by: Fern R | Jun 28, 2007 10:13:47 AM
I always just thought they did it to be irritating. They're annoying. Hate them. Spam is just stupid. (sorry, I'm not so rational at 2am).
Posted by: AnnieD | Jun 28, 2007 10:20:23 AM
You can't set this up where people have to enter a code to post? The bots can't beat that.
Posted by: K Newman | Jun 28, 2007 12:39:45 PM
As a matter of fact, it always asks me for a code to post a comment here (and I don't think I'm a spammer...)
Posted by: Dave (Balashon) | Jun 28, 2007 1:47:09 PM
OK, funny - this time it davka didn't ask...
Posted by: Dave (Balashon) | Jun 28, 2007 1:47:33 PM
Since I switched from MT to Word Press and started using the plug-in "Akismet" all of the spam has been caught and can all be deleted with one click... and I don't use a captcha.
Posted by: oceanguy | Jun 28, 2007 2:53:06 PM
Sadly, there is no CMS with comment function that cannot be tricked by those who are eager to trick it (read, spammers and spam).
sam.zoy.org/pwntcha/
for example is a means to trick Captcha....
Posted by: Account Deleted | Jun 28, 2007 3:31:17 PM
This is one of the (many) reasons why I own a Mac. We are not immune to ALL spam but it helps.
Posted by: Ilana-Davita | Jun 28, 2007 4:17:15 PM
Same reason why we have viruses, someone has to clean up the mess and it's going to cost you.
Posted by: Rami | Jun 28, 2007 5:18:58 PM
Maybe it's time for you to set up your Pap smear?
Posted by: psychotoddler | Jun 28, 2007 5:47:15 PM
Enlightenment please.
Personally I find shouting serenity now works wonders for me.
Posted by: Jack | Jun 28, 2007 6:34:58 PM
Way to stretch a metaphor! Spam, which originally was a semi-heinous canned meat product, now means unwanted email, comments, or track-back. Now you've analogized it to a cold speculum in one's crotch. Nice imagery!
Posted by: Albert | Jun 29, 2007 12:09:52 AM
My guess is you are being actively targeted for this kind of treatment. Your best bet is to ignore them and don't give spammers the satisfaction of knowing they have affected you. By writing a post about them you embolden them to take further action, and reveal your vulnerabilities. Think how they think - it's a game for some alienated nerd with too much time on their hands.
Posted by: Aussie Joel | Jun 29, 2007 9:43:46 AM
All I have to say about spam is: "Pap3ud#jmq, Papxanh5s, Papzqu&dy, ..."
Posted by: Bob | Jun 30, 2007 6:11:20 AM
The comments to this entry are closed.
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.