« 'For Later' (pronounced: 'fah laytah') | Main | Nothing Specific... »

Tuesday, January 10, 2006

Reverse Battleship

Most of you are probably familiar with the classic Milton Bradley game Battleship.  Basically, two players sit across from one another and take turns guessing where the other person's ships are located.  Correct and incorrect guesses are marked with pegs (red for 'hits' and white for 'misses'), until the constant probing reveals the exact location and orientation of all the opponent's ships... and leads to their sinking in as short a time period as possible.
Battleship_1
Playing the game of friendship is sort of the opposite of this... a reverse version of Battleship, if you will.  Two people sit opposite one another and delicately probe one another to make sure that they don't sink any of the other person's religious, political or emotional 'ships'.... and the objective is to make the game last as long as possible.

Close friends know the exact location of each other's 'fleets' and instinctively avoid coming too close to the other's 'ships'... but new friends have to ply the waters very carefully or risk causing inadvertent damage.

Yesterday I was in Tel Aviv for a conference and found myself with some unexpected free time in the afternoon.  On a whim I called up Lisa, a talented journaler/journalist with whom I've exchanged many emails and comments... but to whom I've never actually spoken in person.  Lisa immediately suggested we meet for a late lunch at her favorite neighborhood cafe. 

Food?  Good company?  Twist my arm!

I pretty much knew who I was looking for since Lisa has posted pictures of herself from time to time on her site.  But as I approached the cafe I was still a little nervous about not recognizing her right away.

I needn't have worried... there she was, sitting in the center of the cafe's courtyard as though she owned the place.  I felt like I'd walked into 'Cheers' with Norm Peterson... she seemed to know all the waitstaff and even knew when their shifts changed!  To say we got excellent  service (not to mention wonderful food) would be an understatement.

Anyway, back to the game of Battleship... er, I mean reverse Battleship.

Lisa and I know enough about each other from reading one another's journals to realize that there are more than a few potential mines floating just below the surface of any potential friendship between us.  We are from very different religious and political 'places', and we look at our little corner of the world from very different perspectives.  But I think that both of us are more than the sum of any imprecise labels that someone might use to describe us. 

Sitting across from one another in this Tel Aviv cafe, the conversation was quite relaxed and covered an incredible range of topics. But I sensed that we were both probing gently to see where the other person's 'ships' were located... not to attack, but rather to avoid even the perception of an attack.  But it was inevitable that every so often there would be a subtle sign... a change in tone... a tilted head... indicating that one or the other of us had come a little too close to one of those pesky 'ships'. 

It's easy to find what separates two people and point out the obvious.  We see it all too often in on-line flame wars.  Finding common ground takes a little more time... and a bit more sensitivity.

As I said earlier, a more seasoned friendship can effortlessly navigate dangerous shoals because there is a history of mutual respect and trust to keep feelings from being hurt and sensibilities from being offended.  But early in a friendship there is only respect... the trust (hopefully) comes with time.

Lisa, I'm glad you were free to show me a slice of the city you love so much.  I'm delighted that we finally got to sit down and meet face-to-face.   And it was a pleasure playing a nice, leisurely game of 'reverse Battleship' with you over delicious soup, quiche and coffee.

Next time we'll have to include Zahava.

221_16_54

Posted by David Bogner on January 10, 2006 | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c581e53ef00e5505228848834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Reverse Battleship:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I always approve of using a board game as a metaphor for real life.

And the more games you play, the more metaphors you can find and use!

Yehuda

Posted by: Shade_Jon | Jan 10, 2006 9:18:21 AM

I enjoyed the analogy. Well done.

Posted by: Jack | Jan 10, 2006 9:29:47 AM

I have to take this opportunity to recommend one of my favorite humor sites, the Book of Ratings. Here he rates Board Games, with a good rating for Battleship:

http://www.bookofratings.com/boardgames.html

Posted by: Dave | Jan 10, 2006 10:06:25 AM

Great post.

Just a question on the Battleship analogy.

Do you feel that the danger exists to eventually run out of targets to miss, and eventually you will come to have to take aim at the difficult issues if the relationship is to grow?

Posted by: Ze'ev | Jan 10, 2006 11:06:21 AM

One of the things I most appreciate about your blog is your sense of balance and openness to people and ideas you do ot necessarily agree with - wonderful to see a real-life example of that.

Posted by: mcaryeh | Jan 10, 2006 12:03:02 PM

First of all, how come you didn't post the photo I took of you with Computer Bull on Rothschild Boulevard, huh? ;)

David, I'm so glad you called; I enjoyed meeting and talking to you very much. You are excellent company. The funny thing is that I didn't feel any of the hesitation or apprehension you describe. I think that differences in opinion add spice to a conversation - especially with an intelligent partner.

A friend of mine who was born and raised in the U.K. and moved here about 30 years ago once said that she loves living in Israel because it's the only place in the world she can speak her mind without being considered rude or provocative.

I hope that the next time we meet - avec Zahava, inshallah - you won't censor yourself. I didn't censor myself with you.

The longer I live, the more clearly I understand that differences in lifestyle, religious belief or shades of political opinion are irrelevant - as long as core values about tolerance, respect and humanity are shared.

Neither one of us is as an extremist - and it is the very lack of those core values that characterizes extremists, whether they be on the left or the right. Perhaps that's why they dislike each other so much: because they share negative characteristics.

And I cannot recall ever having won a game of Battleship when I was a kid.

Posted by: Lisa | Jan 10, 2006 1:36:32 PM

Shade Jon... This is one of the more tame metaphors to appear here at treppenwitz. I once compared myself to an enzyme. Not pretty. :-)

Jack... I'm here to serve. :-)

Dave... Thanks. As always you are able to drill down to the next level... always appreciated.

Ze'ev... With friends I would have to say no... it is possible to have a very good, strong friendship develop so long as both friends tacitly agree that certain subjects are out of bounds. This agreement may come about without either of them having made a conscious decision. Think about some of your friends. Are there any with whom you can't discuss marriage (the perennially single ones), weight (the obese ones), religion, politics... ? If we were talking about a potential spouse I would say that yes, you would eventually have to have everything out on the table... but friends? No.

Mcaryeh... I'm sure that a good portion of what you call 'balance' and 'openness' is simply my not having too many 'non-negotiable' agenda items. Trust me when I say that I am not very balanced and open when those few topics come up. :-)

Lisa... The photo was wonderful... except for the fact that I look heavier than the bull! :-) I'm glad you enjoyed yourself as much as I did. I really didn't censor myself so much as I opted to pursue one interesting conversation topic over another based on your body language and expression. I'm sure I won't do that as much once we know each-other better.

Posted by: treppenwitz | Jan 10, 2006 2:20:50 PM

David, I personally find that there are some issues, at least personally speaking, that even if not discussed, can make things a bit uncomfortable:

http://israelperspectives.blogspot.com/2006/01/aliyah-blue-and-white-elephant.html

Posted by: Ze'ev | Jan 10, 2006 2:46:49 PM

"Neither one of us is as an extremist"

I do believe it's a lot easier not to be an extremist if one is a Jewish Israeli than if one is a Jewish Zionist living in the Diaspora.

Posted by: Pooh | Jan 10, 2006 3:41:40 PM

Pooh, I would say the exact opposite. In Israel, it's much easier to be considered an extremist. In the Diaspora, everything is theoretical, opiinions are just that, and very little stands behind them

In Israel, ideology leads to action, and that scares a lot of people.

Posted by: Ze'ev | Jan 10, 2006 4:30:59 PM

There is so much to learn from the two perceptions of how the afternoon went. David felt the need to steer clear of certain topics, and read Lisa's body language.

Lisa didn't feel that need at all.

Perhaps because, in her perception, everything is ok as long as someone is "tolerant" and "not an extremist", and she feels that she is the first and not the second.

David, on the other hand, keeps things back, because, perhaps, he is afraid of offending Lisa and will be judged as "intolerant" and "an extremist".

Those of us who identify with the right side of the political spectrum here in Israel, and those of us who are religious, and those of us who live over the green line (and the really pitiful ones who are all three - G-d have mercy ;) find that we must constantly censor ourselves when speaking with those who don't share at least one of the above characteristics, due to the fear of being slapped with the "intolerant" or "extremist" label. This is what the Israeli media bias has done to our minds. I never felt that way when I lived in America.

Posted by: annonymous | Jan 10, 2006 6:18:01 PM

Very nice analogy. Once you become friends with someone, there are definitely topics that you don't mention or dwell upon. Usually the friend knows your stance, and it's not worth the argument, if you want to maintain the friendship. As you said, a potential spouse is a different story.

Posted by: Essie | Jan 10, 2006 6:43:22 PM

Battleship - or reverse battleship - as a metaphor for friendship?

Boy, Trep, you musta felt awfully uncomfortable sitting in that cafe.

With your kipah on.

Oh - and were you wearing anything orange...

Friendship? Or even a meeting of equals?

Both have as their basis a certain sense of being unconditionally accepted - which is noticably lacking from your report.

Posted by: Ben-David | Jan 10, 2006 7:33:06 PM

"The longer I live, the more clearly I understand that differences in lifestyle, religious belief or shades of political opinion are irrelevant - as long as core values about tolerance, respect and humanity are shared. Neither one of us is as an extremist - and it is the very lack of those core values that characterizes extremists, whether they be on the left or the right."

Brilliantly said, and sadly true. Religion, of any faith, too often becomes the justification for the lack of those core values. One can find almost anything they want to back up their ideologies and fear.

I think that many of us may know people that we are close to that continue to harbor these opinions and back them up with Torah or other religious doctrines. The question is how do you continue a relationship with someone, when those differences are so great?

Posted by: jaime | Jan 10, 2006 7:35:59 PM

Ben-David, the cafe has a kosher certificate and the people sitting at the next table were an Orthodox journalist who was raised in Mea Shearim, his wife and their new baby. They live in Kfar Chabad, and they are regulars at the cafe.

Posted by: Lisa | Jan 10, 2006 7:47:21 PM

Ze'ev... We'll have to agree to disagree on that. I have plenty of friendships where one or more topics are out of bounds by mutual, tacit agreement. Sometimes I'm the one who harbors the issue that can't be discussed.

Pooh... You haven't met some of my neighbors... or Lisa's neighbors, for that matter. Extremists are a surprisingly hardy breed of people that seem to flourish just about everywhere. The one comforting thing for me is that I have the luxury of ignoring the extremists who live abroad.

annonymous (sic)... If someone had bet me cash money that this post would elicit a response like yours, I would have wagered my house that they were wrong. This was supposed to be a post about two people, with at least as much in common as what separates them, playing a pleasant game of 'getting to know you' over lunch. How can you turn something like that into fodder for such an antagonistic comment? Yes, you could say that perhaps I was more circumspect about the topics of conversation than Lisa... but that isn't particularly surprising. The religious right took a beating in the press and in the court of public opinion this past summer. A tiny minority actually deserved to be vilified, but it was expedient to paint all settlers... especially religious ones... with the same broad brush. For better or worse I am a religious settler. When talking to a relative stranger for the first time... especially one from the other side of the political divide... I have a choice of either bringing up all the hot button topics and ensuring that she thinks I'm a compete one-issue lunatic, or I can talk about the gazillion other subjects we both might find interesting that will allow her to see me as a human being, sans labels. Who are you to tell me how to make friends?

Essie... Thank you. I'm glad your's was the next comment or I might have started throwing stuff. :-)

Ben-David... I see that Lisa has already corrected you on a couple of things, but I'll add my two cents. First, I couldn't have felt more at ease. Lisa was a perfect host and graciously refrained from mocking me when I had to call her 5 times on her cell phone because I couldn't find the cafe. She recommended the cafe and immediately told me it was kosher. I didn't ask and didn't even look for a kashrut certificate. The fact that Lisa volunteered the info was good enough for me. Next, if I didn't feel uncomfortable wearing a kippah on a US Navy frigate in front of red necks and farm boys, many of whom had never seen a Jew before... I guess it would be pretty silly to feel uncomfortable wearing one in a Tel Aviv cafe. Another thing... I didn't wear orange during the disengagement, so why would I wear it to an impromptu meeting with Lisa (unless you're suggesting I should have done so to try to provoke a reaction)? As to your 'meeting of equals' comment, equals can sometimes feel as though they are on somewhat different footing. I'll admit I am sensitive to the way religious settlers have been portrayed in the press recently. That weighs on my mind whenever I meet people who are secular or anywhere left of center. This doesn't make us unequal... it just means I have some baggage to unload, and I can't lay it all at Lisa's feet. This was my issue, not hers.

Jaime... She does have a way with words, doesn't she :-)

Posted by: treppenwitz | Jan 10, 2006 10:49:38 PM

These words cut close to my heat. The key is a certain trust of the other person's decency, so that even when the opinions are so very different that trust hovers over all.

Posted by: rabbi neil fleischmann | Jan 11, 2006 12:02:04 AM

Hmm... an interesting issue to bring up... Generally, I don't think people start discussing politics the very first minute they meet, even if they are likely to agree on them, since, I think, human factors are much more important for initial acquaintance. Should certain subjects be avoided with potential friends? Maybe, it depends on what your friendship is based. I'm of an opinion that if friendship is based ONLY on mutual interests, it's not much of an interest. However, if friendship is based on character (core values), people eventually learn to be open-minded to the points of views of their friends or at least respect their right to an opinion. However, all that takes time, especially with very sensitive subjects. And sometimes, discussing politics (or religion, or whatever) is simply not worth the hassle if it's not important to the relationship itself.

Posted by: Irina | Jan 11, 2006 12:20:10 AM

(I obviously wasn’t there and mean this with humor and affection.)

I imagine it went like this:

Lisa: (Seeing David come in.) Hi! (Jumps up and kisses him on the cheek.)

David: Oooh. We weren’t supposed to touch. G5! You hit my carrier.

Lisa: Huh?

David: Um… Never mind. I’m just thinking about this reverse Battleship idea I might post about. So, you think we might get a reasonable government now that Sharon is all gorked out?

Lisa: WHAT?? That’s a horrible thing to say!

David: Ahh… Sorry. D3. I hit your submarine. Sorry about that.

Lisa: What are you talking about? Here’s a menu. Everything’s yummy. I come here all the time.

David: Well, I’m fleishig so I can’t have dairy yet, but you probably never pay attention to that since you’re a secular lefty.

Lisa: (dumps her water glass on his head)

David: You sunk my battleship!

Posted by: Doctor Bean | Jan 11, 2006 1:22:58 AM

"Pooh... You haven't met some of my neighbors... or Lisa's neighbors, for that matter. Extremists are a surprisingly hardy breed of people that seem to flourish just about everywhere."

The point I was making concerns the kind of position one feels one has to adopt in the Diaspora in response to the kind of vicious and malign criticism that is made of Israel day in and day out. This is actually something I have felt a lot more in the UK, France and Canada than in the US.

Posted by: Pooh | Jan 11, 2006 2:26:07 AM

Rabbi Neil Fleischmann...Too true. At the heart of any honest relationship is the assumption that the other person isn't looking to hamstring you. Two people can hold very different opinions and even argue over the best solution to a vexing problem (or even whether the problem exists). But that basic decency you mentioned is essential for an honest exchange of ideas.

Irina. I keep coming back to the cocktail party analogy when these sort of topics come up. In a crowded setting full of people that are first getting to know one another it would be unthinkable to say some of the inflammatory things that pass for comments in the blogosphere. It's almost as if people want to get the first punch in because they assume they are eventually going to be hit.

Doctor Bean... I saw this first thing this morning and was laughing so hard I almost woke the baby! I was on my way to work when Zahava called me in the car to ask if I'd read your comment, and it was clear you tickled her funny bone as well. If we can't laugh at ourselves like this what's the point? Nicely done.

Pooh... I got your meaning. I was just pointing out that no matter where you might find yourself, it is always possible to feel somewhat alone, vulnerable and embattled because of your beliefs and deeply held convictions. Try walking around certain sections of north Tel Aviv with a kippah on your head and a pistol in your belt. I never felt that isolated in the US.

Posted by: treppenwitz | Jan 11, 2006 1:08:50 PM

While the subject of the Battleship analogy is interesting by itself (but a bit limiting, cause it assumes an equal number a purpose of the squares on each board), the most intriguing thing is that neither side is ready to disclose the name or address of that mysterious excellent cafe.

What with the scarcity of good places, keeping your cards that close is... ehehe...

Posted by: SnoopyTheGoon | Jan 11, 2006 5:02:33 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.