« good news & bad news | Main | Look over there! »

Tuesday, September 28, 2004

Kidnapping the truth

When I was in my second year at The Hebrew University in Jerusalem, I became friendly with a Druze student who was a year ahead of me in the International Relations program.

Those unfamiliar with the Druze faith/culture shouldn’t feel bad. They prefer it that way. There are less than a million practitioners of this secretive religion worldwide, and even those who are familiar with the tenets of the Druze faith have trouble placing them within the more accessible framework of the larger world religions.

The Druze nominally consider themselves a type of Muslim, but do not accept the Koran. They believe in reincarnation, but do not share the eastern concept of constant rebirth leading to a joining with a higher power. They are pure monotheists, but believe that there have been as many as 72 human incarnations of a higher power/order. They believe in man having complete free will, but they also believe in a passionless deity that doesn’t care about man’s actions. They believe that there is no longer a chance for further human incarnations of the deity, but that at some point there will be some sort of divine intervention in world events.

And most of all, he told me that their first and most important ‘commandment’ is to love truth.

Obviously, what I don’t know about the Druze religion and culture can (and does), fill volumes. But what I learned from this one Druze student helped me understand why his coreligionists were so difficult to classify… even in terms of religious and national allegiances.

Druze villages in the mountains of Lebanon and Syria are often staunchly anti-Israeli… and the Druze communities living a few miles away in the upper Galilee region of Israel are so ardently patriotic that many of them serve in elite combat units of the Israel Defense Forces/Border Patrol. The irony is that these disparate Druze communities are mostly related by blood or marriage to one another, and would gladly reunite with one another without regard to their divergence of loyalties.

When I asked him about this strange (to me) situation, he pointed out that when a perfect truth is not available (when is it ever?), one has no choice but to accept the best available truth. These communities in Israel, Lebanon and Syria are first and foremost Druze (a term he used interchangeably with truthful) … and then things like allegiance to governments and policies come into play.

When we met, I had assumed he was either a Christian or Muslim Arab (there were plenty of both on campus), but noticed that his circle of friends was exclusively Jewish. He had done his national service in the Border Patrol, and had chosen to study International Relations because he thought it offered the best opportunity to discover the truth about why countries (especially in the Middle East) acted the way they did.

I would like to say I kept in touch with this friend over the years and that we had a joyful reunion when I moved back to Israel. But the fact is I have always been a lousy correspondent (even for a guy), and we really hadn’t been that close. Truth be told, the reason I haven’t mentioned his name is that I can’t remember it!

What got me thinking about this long-ago friendship was the recent Palestinian kidnapping of Riyad Ali (who would have been a few years behind me at Hebrew U), a CNN producer who was born and raised in a Druze village in the Galilee.

That a Druze would pursue a career in journalism is not particularly surprising, given their affinity for truth. But why would the Palestinians grab a Druze hostage rather than one of the more abundant Jews? They had targeted a non-combatant (even by their own malleable definition of that term) in an otherwise target-rich environment. It made no sense!

Then it hit me: Few people in the world even know what a Druze is! Someone not intimately familiar with the Middle East would assume that this was some internal Muslim-on-Muslim violence and look elsewhere to dole out their daily ration of western empathy.

But Riyad Ali was perhaps the perfect target for the Palestinians. His kidnapping would outrage both the Druze and Jewish Israeli communities, but would ruffle few feathers outside of the region. It give the Palestinian’s the perfect opportunity to engage in the sort of barbarism that the ‘Religion of Peace’ has been perpetrating over in Iraq, without incurring the inevitable international outcry and condemnation.

The awful irony in all this is that the Palestinians, by targeting a Druze… a ‘lover of truth’… have found the perfect way to conceal the truth about their own viciousness and barbarism from the rest of the world.

If you love truth (regardless of your religion or lack-thereof), don’t view this kidnapping as ‘just another act of violence in an already violent region’. See it for what it is… an attack on the truth.

Posted by David Bogner on September 28, 2004 | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c581e53ef00e55051fb498834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Kidnapping the truth:

Comments

Yes, I too saw this charming feature story on today's front page. However, I really didn't understand why this particular CNN journalist was targeted (especially considering some his more internationally recognized travel companions) – your perspective offers provacative insight to this crime. It also saddens me, since I think you are quite right in assuming it will attract little international notice. My heart goes out to Riyad Ali's family – I hope he is returned to them alive and well...

Posted by: zahava | Sep 28, 2004 11:59:38 AM

On the other hand, Riyad Ali is a serious hater of Israel and the Jewish State. He is not your average Druze. He declined to serve in the IDF and has pursued a career inciting hatred against Israel and helping foreign journalists find photogenic terrorist "spokesmen" to interview.

Posted by: Left Exile | Sep 28, 2004 3:21:14 PM

Left Exile... I was tempted to add the 'live by the sword, die by the sword' angle (not being a fan of CNN or its view of Israel).... but I considered it a cheap shot.

I am not familiar with, nor interested in his personal politics. But it is worth noting that you have assigned all of these things to this man without providing a single source or reference. There are many people on the fringes of Israel's political spectrum who throw around terms like 'Hater of Israel'. Thank G-d we live in a scoiety where people have the freedom to throw around such terms.

This is a human being who holds an Israeli passport, was educated in an Israeli University, and was likely targeted because of his Israeli (or at least non-Palestinian) affiliations.

That makes him worthy of my concern.

Posted by: David | Sep 28, 2004 3:33:36 PM

When I read the article on cnn.com yesterday, they were basically saying that Riad has good contacts in Gaza and has always made it possible for his team to operate there without trouble. Basically that he is more than just a sympathizer - that he's a friendly.

My immediate impression, which I still see no reason to disbelieve, was that they simply took him to interview someone or film something, in the hopes that his "stamp" on it would make it valid. (i.e not as a hostage)

Posted by: Tanya | Sep 28, 2004 4:42:33 PM

Tanya... for his sake I hope you're right.

Although, personally... if someone wanted to avail themselves of my services, I would hope they could come up with a better way of asking!

Posted by: David | Sep 28, 2004 5:11:57 PM

I don't hope for his sake - he has lost my sympathy. But I do hope for his family's sake.

Even if they had submitted an engraved invitation, I doubt he could have gotten permission to accept it - even from cnn. And they did ask for him by name.

Posted by: Tanya | Sep 28, 2004 5:33:24 PM

Hey, you were right. (Not that I'm surprised.)

"On the video, which was recorded while he was held captive, Ali called for the Druze not to serve in the Israeli military, saying that the cause of the Druze is the same as that of the Palestinians."

He's free, at least. Nice of Arafat to give him a ring to congratulate him, huh? Such a gentleman, that one.

Posted by: Tanya | Sep 28, 2004 7:30:19 PM

Hmmmm. Or maybe we both are...

Shutting up now. Honest.

Posted by: Tanya | Sep 28, 2004 10:41:07 PM

It is looking like he may have been at least a partly willing participant in this 'kidnapping', which changes my opinion of him personally.

However it doesn't change my mind about the fact that EVERY citizen of Israel is entitled to its protection, Arab, Jew, Christian, Bahai, or Druze... no matter their political leanings.

If [insert name of person on the other end of the political spectrum from you who makes you insane with rage whenever they open their mouth] was kidnapped by the Palestinians, they are still Israelis and entitled to every ounce of effort the country can bring to bear to get them free. Likewise, the world should take notice when an Israeli is killed, wounded or kidnapped... not just when it is someone with which we agree.

Posted by: David | Sep 28, 2004 11:37:44 PM

I still wanted him freed. I just want to kick him too. They aren't mutually exclusive wishes.

Posted by: Tanya | Sep 29, 2004 1:49:19 AM

I found your view on the Druze interesting; over the last 20 years the Druze have developed a global identity and the Druze in Israeli though they are Arabs, see themselves as Israelis first. The kidnapping of the Druze is only the beginning of the tension developing for the Druze. The Druze can relate better to Arab culture and can sympathies with the Palestinian cause. The Problem is of faith, where the Druze are considered sinners of Islam by branching off. The kidnapping of a Druze CNN worker is just the beginning for the Druze both in Israel and in the Arab world; the Druze though they currently are more Pro-Arab will inevitably side with the Jewish state because of Islamic fundamentalism. The success of the relationship between the Jews and the Druze is the coexistence and respect they receive in Israeli society. But it is also true that though the Druze play a important role in Israel and have given their blood, the Jewish community has not come forward with the promises of assistance and help to bridge the economic gap. Hopefully someone in the Jewish community with influence will make a move to address this matter.

Posted by: chuckyboy | Dec 14, 2004 9:26:28 PM

Post a comment